Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Jul 31, 2011 1:20pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

I can't really separate 68-69 from 70-71 and 72-75 would come a close second to those two. I never venture into the 80s these days - I've tried in the past, I really have - even though all bar two of the shows I saw were in the 80s I just can't find much love for that era.

One thing though, there are some very nice shows from 66 and 67 - how come you cut those primal years off?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Jacky Hughes Date: Jul 31, 2011 1:27pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

That would be purely down to my ignorance of that period Rob.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Jul 31, 2011 1:36pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

Try this one, Jacky.

http://www.archive.org/details/gd1966-07-16.sbd.miller.89555.sbeok.flac16

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Jacky Hughes Date: Aug 1, 2011 9:59am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

Thanks for the recommendation Rob. I'm streaming it now.

It's very fine Miller transfer, but just a little too primal for my tastes.
That surely is a nasty organ tone that Pigpen is using.

I like the Viola Blues though.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: user unknown Date: Jul 31, 2011 2:09pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

what rob said...but I pretty much like the entire 30 year run